Results 1 to 9 of 9
Thread: Simple double calculations...
 08312011, 10:54 AM #1Member
 Join Date
 Aug 2011
 Posts
 22
 Rep Power
 0
Simple double calculations...
Hi there, it's me again asking basic Java questions ^^'
At some point in my program I have run into weird results when subtracting a hundredth to a double value.
I created this SSCCE to show what I'm talking about:
Java Code:public static void main(String[] args) { double value = 1.02; System.out.println(value+"  0.01 = "+(value0.01)); value = 2.02; System.out.println(value+"  0.01 = "+(value0.01)); value = 43.09; System.out.println(value+"  0.01 = "+(value0.01)); value = 95.07; System.out.println(value+"  0.01 = "+(value0.01)); value = 205.05; System.out.println(value+"  0.01 = "+(value0.01)); }
Java Code:1.02  0.01 = 1.01 2.02  0.01 = 2.0100000000000002 43.09  0.01 = 43.080000000000005 95.07  0.01 = 95.05999999999999 205.05  0.01 = 205.04000000000002
Thanks in advance once again,
b0rtLast edited by b0rt; 08312011 at 10:58 AM. Reason: Added different decimal values
 08312011, 11:11 AM #2Member
 Join Date
 Aug 2011
 Posts
 22
 Rep Power
 0
Oh, just found out myself...
Instead of:
Java Code:System.out.println(value+"  0.01 = "+(value0.01);
Java Code:System.out.println(value+"  0.01 = "+((value*100)1)/100.00);
But still feels awkward having those results...
Does anyone know why Java can't make proper decimal subtractions?Last edited by b0rt; 08312011 at 11:25 AM. Reason: spelling + question
 08312011, 11:53 AM #3Moderator
 Join Date
 Apr 2009
 Posts
 13,230
 Rep Power
 23
 08312011, 01:59 PM #4Member
 Join Date
 Aug 2011
 Posts
 22
 Rep Power
 0
Thanks for the link Toll!
I can understand that decimal values are represented in memory in an abstract way and that can cause errors when managing high numbers but... it just fails with a simple subtraction like:
2.02  0.01
It feels like a very tacky implementation to me... if you use one pair of integers (int base, int power) to represent a floating point number (value = base * 10 ^ power) it should not be so prone to errors...
I can imagine it is done to save memory consumption but still feels cheese having to do these tricks in order to avoid precision errors.
Hope I don't disturb anyone with my opinion, because it's just that.
Regards!
 08312011, 02:03 PM #5Moderator
 Join Date
 Feb 2009
 Location
 New Zealand
 Posts
 4,712
 Rep Power
 15
It gets much worse!
Mathematicians imagine (but only imagine!) quantities with infinite precision. Computers deal with finite time and finite resources: there isn't paper enough in all the world to write down the real numbers between 0 and 1 using a finite alphabet. So computers cheat and use well established rules for dealing with quantites using only finite precision. Java follows these rules faithfully and in a cross platform way. (as detailed in the link)
It's worse because the mathematician imagines proper decimal subtraction until the day he imagines no more. Finiteness wins.

The results you are getting are probably quite good enough: just ugly. (BigDecimal offers arbitrary, though still finite, precision if you must.) You deal with ugliness using some version of formatting like DecimalFormat or one of the printf() tribe.
 08312011, 02:15 PM #6Moderator
 Join Date
 Feb 2009
 Location
 New Zealand
 Posts
 4,712
 Rep Power
 15
And what makes 2.020.01 simple? More simple than e^pi, say.
Anyway the important thing is to use formatting to get the output looking exactly the way you want rather than resorting to near enough arithmetical tricks to blugeon the quantities.
 08312011, 02:18 PM #7
 Join Date
 Sep 2008
 Location
 Voorschoten, the Netherlands
 Posts
 14,394
 Blog Entries
 7
 Rep Power
 25
Build a wall around Donald Trump; I'll pay for it.
 08312011, 02:42 PM #8Member
 Join Date
 Jan 2011
 Posts
 67
 Rep Power
 0
Please keep in mind that asking a computer to subtract 0.01 from 2.02 is equally as "simple" as asking you to subtract a third from 1, but I'd like to see you try that in base 10 :P.
Computers work in base 2 (binary) while most humans are used to working in base 10 (decimal) and not all decimal numbers can be properly represented using binary. Similarly in base 3 subtracting a third from 1 is easy it's just 1  0.1 = 0.2, but it's impossible to represent a third in base 10 which is why I have to keep referring to it as a "third" rather than the numerical representation which in decimal is something like 0.33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 ect.Last edited by Skiller; 08312011 at 02:46 PM.
Currently developing Cave Dwellers, a Dwarf Fortress/Minecraft style game for Android.
 08312011, 03:01 PM #9Moderator
 Join Date
 Feb 2009
 Location
 New Zealand
 Posts
 4,712
 Rep Power
 15
The base 2 business is often mentioned in this context (and it does play a role in the standards of floating point arithmetic conventionally adopted) but the problem is deeper: you can't uniquely name the real numbers over ever so small a continuous range with finite strings drawn from a finite alphabet whatever the convention you use for the numerals.
(I deliberately put it that way to avoid the point Jos mentioned: you could just represent a quantity analogically with a voltage or whatever. I was actually thinking of those characters in Gulliver's Travels who avoided the ambiguities of language by using real objects to communicate.)
Similar Threads

Rounding calculations
By lynxbci in forum New To JavaReplies: 9Last Post: 08202011, 03:49 PM 
Thread calculations, and another thread to use the calculations
By phil128 in forum Threads and SynchronizationReplies: 4Last Post: 12122010, 05:32 PM 
Help Please: SWT double buffering simple animation
By darkthawt in forum SWT / JFaceReplies: 1Last Post: 06242010, 11:06 PM 
[SOLVED] Simple Calculations in Java
By fullmetaljacket in forum New To JavaReplies: 9Last Post: 05192009, 03:19 AM 
decimal calculations?
By arnab321 in forum CLDC and MIDPReplies: 5Last Post: 11192008, 04:36 AM
Bookmarks