Hi I am Ranjith Reintroducing myself on this day

[ranjiths]

Hi

I am Ranjith and am very much interested in Java. I joined this forum in 2009 itself but had forgotten all about it. Today I came accross this forum searching on the net and tried to registered when an error message said that my e mail is already associated with an account. Even now, I do not remember the day when I joined this forum.

I just know the basic level Java. I think I might be able to solve other problems regarding basic Java that are posted in New Java sub forum.

Hope that I will be able to learn a lot more about Java in this forum.

I also plan to craete a site with information and tutuorials that will help the one who does not know anything about java to learn the language.

- Ranjith

[sunde887]

Welcome back. Hope to see you around.

[DarrylBurke]

Hope not, seeing the poor quality of responses already posted. Signature link spammers are a pain.

db

[ranjiths]

Welcome back. Hope to see you around.

Thank you.

[ranjiths]

Hope not, seeing the poor quality of responses already posted. Signature link spammers are a pain.

db

I would like to say you that when you have posted some 1500 messages on this forum, it doesn't give you a right to talk in that uncourteous way to other members. You need to know the basic ethics of speaking to others before being a master of Java. Before hitting the 'Submit reply button' you need to think over it a bit to see that it doesn't hurt other members. How do you say that my responses are of low quality. You can check up the answers given by me at

1. 2-D array help
2. Tenary condition operator
3. Defining numerical set in java

I accept that I am not a master of Java, but still I can share the knowledge that I have with the ones who have just started learning Java. Coming to the ginature issue that you have raised in 2-D array help I would like to say that there is no limitation on signature size, as far as I know. Moreover, if you hate seeing signatures, you can turn on the option 'Don't show user signatures in the CP'. Hope that you know this small fact after having posted some 1500 answer (I don't know how many of them have accussed other members) and earned a +5 reputation. And another thing a forum survives on basically two kinds of people: one who come without having any ideas of personal gains in mind and secondly those who value their own time and wish to get something in return for contributing to the forum.

One doubt, why do you bother so much about others including their blog name in their signature. You too can do that if you like to do so and you have no right to tell others not to do it. For your satisfaction, I have reduced the signature size. It doesn't mean that I accept that I have done something something.
I request that you behave in a polite way to new users of the forum.

There comes many obstacles in your life most of which are created by those always trying to find a fault in others when they themselves are storehouses of evil . The only thing that you can do is to offer them an explanation and continue your journey. You live for yourself not for others.

[BZwap]

Hope not, seeing the poor quality of responses already posted. Signature link spammers are a pain.

db

:mad::mad:Just stop all these comments... You should peep into the time when u were new to java. So please stop harassing others.

[ranjiths]

:mad::mad:Just stop all these comments... You should peep into the time when u were new to java. So please stop harassing others.

Thanks for supporting.
It is with practise and mutual discussions that one can master a programming language.- Ranjith

[sunde887]

We get a lot of users who join up with a sig link and mediocre advice who end up being spammers. Also, if he tells you that you are giving bad advice don't get so bent out of shape. It's good to have someone who will bluntly tell you when you are wrong. If you are really just a new java user then I welcome you to continue but be glad when people can tell you when you are incorrect. It can help you learn.

[ranjiths]

We get a lot of users who join up with a sig link and mediocre advice who end up being spammers. Also, if he tells you that you are giving bad advice don't get so bent out of shape. It's good to have someone who will bluntly tell you when you are wrong. If you are really just a new java user then I welcome you to continue but be glad when people can tell you when you are incorrect. It can help you learn.

Thank you for YOUR ADVICE

[Fubarable]

...You can check up the answers given by me at

1. 2-D array help
2. Tenary condition operator
3. Defining numerical set in java

I accept that I am not a master of Java, ...

OK, I did check on these threads since you submitted them for judgement, and I have to agree with Darryl on this one. Your replies especially in threads 2 and 3 were off and misleading to newbies.

For instance you state:

If then else structure:

if(condition)
expression1;
else
expression2;
The above can be replaced by
condition?expression1:expression2;

and that is not true. For instance

if (myBoolean) {
   myInt = 3;
}  else {
   myInt = 4;
}

Cannot be replaced by

myBoolean ? myInt = 3 : myInt = 4;

Next you state

You can use a nested loops if you would like to avoid using &&
Following will be the code snippet:

int i=0;
while(i<=10)
{
if(i>=2)
System.out.println(i)
}
}

and this is not only wrong but if it compiled (it doesn't) it would give the original poster code that will loop forever.

[ranjiths]

OK, I did check on these threads since you submitted them for judgement, and I have to agree with Darryl on this one. Your replies especially in threads 2 and 3 were off and misleading to newbies.

For instance you state:



and that is not true. For instance

if (myBoolean) {
   myInt = 3;
}  else {
   myInt = 4;
}

Cannot be replaced by

myBoolean ? myInt = 3 : myInt = 4;

Next you state


and this is not only wrong but if it compiled (it doesn't) it would give the original poster code that will loop forever.

All my responses in the second thread have been deleted by me. And I have modified my answer for the third thread. (Added the statement i++). Hope that it is fine now.
And to DarrylBurke, I have changed my signature (removed the link to my blog) and hope that you would never again complain of my OVERSIZE SIGNATURE as you have done in around three threads.
THANKS TO MODERATOR FOR CHECKING THE REPLIES STATED BY ME.
SORRY IF THERE WAS ANY MISTAKE ON MY PART AND YOU MAY BAN ME FROM THIS FORUM IF YOU CONSIDER ME TO BE A SPAMMER.