Urgent

[agentkiran007]

Hi friends. I doing serializing objects. I storing all data related to the object with the actual content of instance variables. But i want only content of instance variables without other content. Please its urgent for me. Thanks in Advance.

[Tolls]

??
Could you explain that again?
Beyond serializing I didn't really understand any of that.

[cselic]

^ You are right.
Please explain it better. Give us some example of that what you are trying to do.

[JosAH]

??
Could you explain that again?
Beyond serializing I didn't really understand any of that.

I think he only wants the banana, not the entire gorilla that comes with it; i.e. the OP only wants one instance variable value, not the entire object. The Serializable API documentation gives quite a lot of clues about tailoring the serialization process itself for certain classes.

kind regards,

Jos

[Fubarable]

I think he only wants the banana

Yeah, but he wants it urgently. Sadly we are likely too late.

[Ramanjaneyulu]

agentkiran007,
I am guessing you are looking store an object data into database. If my guess is right,please go through this document
Steps to insert Blob object in MySql | Java Cafe
(Note:To work with that code,please replace the character “ with character " in that code)

If you want to avoid particular instance variables while storing the object into database, use "transient" keyword along with the declaration of those particular instance variables.

[Tolls]

Serialising objects into a db always fills me with dread...

[JosAH]

Serialising objects into a db always fills me with dread...

It does? I (ab)use databases for that all the time using simple blobs and it works as a breeze. Of course there's nothing 'relational' about it but ...

kind regards,

Jos

[Tolls]

What do you do it for though?
Is it done locally (embedded possibly), or is it some way of transmitting between systems?

[JosAH]

What do you do it for though?
Is it done locally (embedded possibly), or is it some way of transmitting between systems?

It's hasn't any special purpose; one of my hobby projects is a functional language RPL (Reverse Polish Lisp) and it has a 'persistent' store in which I can store RPL objects associated to other RPL objects. When I ask for the key it passes me back the associated value which can be used in my RPL system again. I use a relational database for the persistent storage and the RPL objects are simply serialized forms of the internal objects; I think it's fun ;-)

I keep a repository on Huddle; if you're interested I can make you a member of the project (there's one other member in South Africa so there is a user group ;-)

kind regards,

Jos

[Tolls]

"Reverse Polish Lisp"?

RPL/2 is a special language, and could be the strange child of forbidden love between Lisp and Forth. The reversed polish notation and the definitional working come from Forth, only keeping an anonymous stack; the control structures come from Lisp. What a brilliant genealogy !

(from here)

Good God!
:eek:

[masijade]

"Reverse Polish Lisp"?


(from here)

Good God!
:eek:

You mean Good God, Almighty! ;-)

[j2me64]

the solution is

If you want to avoid particular instance variables while storing the object into database, use "transient" keyword along with the declaration of those particular instance variables.

[JosAH]

You mean Good God, Almighty! ;-)

No, there's nothing special about its evaluation scheme; it is simple as a matter of fact. My version of RPL can also do infix expressions (they are translated to their postfix form internally before evaluation) and lots of other things are possible with it, such as symbolic evaluation, memoization, tail recursion removal, lambda bindings, lazy evaluation, closures (Java can't do it properly, neener, neener, neener! ;-) and some niche features such as voice synthesis. html streams and a simple IDE for the language to make it workable; it can also run in parallel with other (identical) RPL evaluators on any machine or cluster thereof; I do like to test that feature over the internet.

kind regards,

Jos

[masijade]

"Reverse Polish Lisp"

Does that mean that "TH" sounds like "S"? ;-)

[JosAH]

"Reverse Polish Lisp"

Does that mean that "TH" sounds like "S"? ;-)

No, it sounds like "Reverth Polish Lithp" as it should sound ;-)

kind regards,

Jos

[DarrylBurke]

Don't you mean "Reverth Polith Lithp" ? ;-)

[JosAH]

Don't you mean "Reverth Polith Lithp" ? ;-)

Yeth, thorry for the thilly typo.

kind regardth,

Joth ;-)

[Fubarable]

Negative repth for all who lithped in thith thread! Geesh!

[JosAH]

Negative repth for all who lithped in thith thread! Geesh!

Mathiade tharted it! I'm innothent! ;-)

kind regardth,

Joth